top of page

NeD Ground Rules for Artificial Intelligence - aka Technocratic Apartheid


Introducing the International Forum for Democratic Studies for a discussion examining challenges and opportunities for deepening democratic engagement in AI governance. Elizabeth Kerley (Forum) will share key findings from a forthcoming International Forum report, Setting Democratic Ground Rules for AI: Reflections from Civil Society, which emerged from a workshop bringing together Latin American and global researchers and civil society practitioners. Natalia Carfi (Open Data Charter) will provide comments and share further insights on opportunities for promoting democratic approaches to AI. Ryan Heath (Axios Global Technology Correspondent) will moderate the discussion. The National Endowment for Democracy is a private, nonprofit foundation dedicated to the growth and strengthening of democratic institutions around the world. Each year, NED makes more than 2,000 grants to support the projects of non-governmental groups abroad who are working for democratic goals in more than 100 countries. Learn more at https://www.ned.org/


Ryan Heath is Axios’ Global Technology Correspondent and co-author of the Axios AI+ newsletter. Previously, Ryan moderated the first presidential debate of the 2019 EU election, and between 2015 and 2023 wrote POLITICO’s Brussels Playbook, Davos Playbook and Global Insider newsletters and hosted podcasts. He’s the author of two books on politics and worked for the European Commission in Brussels as a presidential speechwriter and later as the Commission’s tech spokesperson. 



Beth Kerley is a program officer managing the International Forum for Democratic Studies’ emerging technologies portfolio, which covers the challenges and opportunities for democracy as technological advances supply new tools of politics and governance. She was previously associate editor of the Journal of Democracy and holds a PhD in History from Harvard University and a Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service from Georgetown University.


Natalia Carfi is the Executive Director of the Open Data Charter. She is the former Open Government Director for the Undersecretary of Public Innovation and Open Government of Argentina where she coordinated the co-creation of the 3rd Open Government National Action Plan. She was also Open Government coordinator for the Digital Division of the Government of Chile and for the City of Buenos Aires. She is part of the Open Data Leaders Network and the Academic Committee of the International Open Data Conference.


The largest provider of data centre services to the federal government, CDC Data Centres, will accelerate development of data centres to meet growing demand for artificial intelligence.


Controversial facial recognition laws previously rejected by Parliament’s intelligence and security committee could be reintroduced in “parallel” with the Albanese government’s new digital identity legislation. The scheme is necessary to realise the government’s vision of biometrically anchored digital identity credentials, as agreed to by federal, state and territory ministers in the National Strategy for Identity Resilience in July 2023.


In October 2019, the Identity-Matching Services Bill that would have enabled a national facial recognition database and automated data sharing was rebuked by the bipartisan Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) amid a raft of concerns, including mass surveillance.


The Face Verification Service (FVS), which allows a person’s photo to be matched against the image on their identity documents, already exists for government agencies, but enabling legislation for its use by the private sector remains stalled.


Click image to read the memorandum


Hosted by FinTech Australia and supported by the Victorian Government, Intersekt 2023 is the fintech conference outlining the trajectory of Digital Identity, Biometric (DNA) verification, transitioning to an Open Data Future and more. Detailed information ecosystem map found in this blog. click here


Digital Identity, What Does Good Look Like and How Do We Get There - September 2023


Solving the Onboarding Challenges with Digital Identity


Transitioning to an Open Data Future


Artificial Intelligence in Fintech Ethics and Bias Lense


A national strategy for AI innovation - this blog maps Silicon Valley and Microsoft


Proof of Concept of Provenance - all roads lead to Silicon Valley - read this blog for details


Behaviour Nudges - Future Social Credit - read this blog for details


What is a digital twin


Implementation of genome - health portfolio


Using synthetic data for healthcare - mimic technology


Synthetic data—artificial data that closely mimic the properties and relationships of real data—are not a new concept but technological advances have led to great optimism about their potential for health research and innovation. However, generating synthetic health data from real patient data has led developers and regulators to question the extent to which they may remain ‘personal data’, governed by data protection law.


PHG Foundation, Are synthetic health data ‘personal data’?, was independently commissioned by the MHRA to assess the status of synthetic health data under data protection law. We evaluated the current legal framework (the UK and EU GDPR), regulatory guidance and latest legal commentary to assess whether—or in what circumstances—synthetic health data might be considered ‘personal data’.


Melbourne scientists model human embryos from skin cells - this blog maps replica and mimic industries in Australia


Future of Value Transfer - this blog maps the US Cloud Agreements



Kommentare

Mit 0 von 5 Sternen bewertet.
Noch keine Ratings

Rating hinzufügen
bottom of page